Skip to main content

A little DVDRam statistic for Linux

A DVDRam kann be formated under Linux with almost any filesystem you ever like. However there are differences in space and time.

The following statistics are the result of copying my internet download collection to three new DVDRams using the 3 diffrent formats

Speed #

Format real user sys
vfat32 51m28.367s 0m0.664s 0m15.566s
udf2 53m47.748s 0m0.462s 0m8.519s
xfs 71m47.594s 0m0.552s 0m12.875s

real time is the time it took to copy - sys is the time where the CPU was actualy doing something - the difference the CPU was either waiting or doing something else. Sad that there is no DVDRam with SCSI - unlike IDE with SCSI the CPU is never waiting and could allways do something else.

The winner is of course udf2 with lowest sys time.

Please note #

However this test is about writing to an new and empty dvdram. When replacing, adding and deleting files on an allready existing dvdram things looks different.

Especialy when reading and writing to a dvdram at the same time dvdrams become quite sluggish.

It’s difficult to measure but I feel that xfs excels in this arena.

Space occupied (human readable): #

Format Dateisystem Größe Benut Verf Ben%25 Eingehängt auf
vfat32 /dev/hdh 4,3G 1,9G 2,4G 44%25 /media/dvdram
udf2 /dev/hdh 4,3G 1,9G 2,5G 44%25 /media/dvdram
xfs /dev/hdh 4,3G 1,9G 2,4G 44%25 /media/dvdram

As you can see the space differences are so minute that one has to look at the blocks to actualy see a difference:

Space occupied (2k blocks): #

Format Dateisystem 2K-Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben%25 Eingehängt auf
vfat32 /dev/hdh 2232020 975784 1256236 44%25 /media/dvdram
udf2 /dev/hdh 2236160 974410 1261750 44%25 /media/dvdram
xfs /dev/hdh 2236192 983115 1253077 44%25 /media/dvdram

Now you can see that the winner is - again - udf with the most unused blocks.